퍼펙트한Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect최고품질예상문제모음최신덤프공부자료

ExamPassdump 에서 출시한 Salesforce인증Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect시험덤프는 100%시험통과율을 보장해드립니다. 엘리트한 IT전문가들이 갖은 노력으로 연구제작한Salesforce인증Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect덤프는 PDF버전과 소프트웨어버전 두가지 버전으로 되어있습니다. 구매전 PDF버전무료샘플로ExamPassdump제품을 체험해보고 구매할수 있기에 신뢰하셔도 됩니다. 시험불합격시 불합격성적표로 덤프비용을 환불받을수 있기에 아무런 고민을 하지 않으셔도 괜찮습니다.

시험은 Apex, Visualforce, Lightning 및 Salesforce API를 포함한 Salesforce 개발과 관련된 다양한 주제를 다루는 객관식 문제로 구성되어 있습니다. 후보자들은 또한 Salesforce를 다른 시스템과 통합하고 사용자 정의 애플리케이션의 배포를 관리하는 것을 포함한 복잡한 솔루션을 설계하고 구현하는 능력을 증명해야 합니다.

>> Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect최고품질 예상문제모음 <<

Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect최고품질 예상문제모음 덤프 ----- IT전문가의 노하우로 만들어진 시험자료

ExamPassdump는 여러분의 꿈을 이루어줄 뿐만 아니라 일년무료 업뎃서비스도 따릅니다. ExamPassdump에서 제공하는 덤프로 여러분은 1000%시험을 패스하실수 있고Salesforce Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect자격증을 취득하실 수 있습니다.지금 바로 사이트에서Salesforce Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect덤프데모 즉 덤프의 일부 문제와 답을 다운 받으셔서 체험하실 수 있습니다.

Salesforce Development-Lifecycle 및 Deployment-Arachitect는 Salesforce 개발, 배포 및 수명주기 관리 분야의 전문가의 기술과 전문 지식을 검증하는 권위있는 인증 시험입니다. 이 인증은 Salesforce 응용 프로그램 및 솔루션을 관리하고 배포 할 책임이있는 건축가, 개발자 및 관리자를 위해 특별히 설계되었습니다. 인증 시험은 다양한 영업 분야 개발 라이프 사이클 및 배포 영역에서 후보자의 지식과 숙련도를 테스트합니다.

Salesforce는 영업 및 마케팅 전문가의 작동 방식에 혁명을 일으킨 CRM (Customer Relationship Management) 플랫폼 중 하나입니다. Salesforce Development-Lifecycle 및 Deployment-Arachitect 인증 시험은 Salesforce 응용 프로그램의 개발, 테스트 및 배포에 대한 철저한 이해를 가진 전문가를 위해 설계되었습니다. 이 인증은 Salesforce 개발 수명주기 및 배포에 대한 전문 지식과 지식을 입증하려는 사람들에게 이상적입니다.

최신 Salesforce Developer Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect 무료샘플문제 (Q27-Q32):

질문 # 27
What is the responsibility of an executive sponsor on a project?

A. Communicate project status
B. Determine project methodology
C. Design executive dashboards
D. Approve changes to project scope

정답：D

설명：
This is the correct answer because the executive sponsor is the senior leader who provides strategic direction, funding, and support for the project. The executive sponsor is also responsible for approving any changes to the project scope, budget, or timeline that may affect the project outcomes or benefits.

질문 # 28
There are many types of quality assurance techniques that can help minimize defects in software projects.
Which two techniques should an architect recommend, for Universal Containers to incorporate into its overall CI/CD pipeline?
Choose 2 answers

A. Business verification testing
B. Stress testing
C. Automated browser testing
D. Static code quality analysis

정답：C,D

설명：
Automated browser testing and static code quality analysis are two quality assurance techniques that can help minimize defects in software projects, and that an architect should recommend for Universal Containers to incorporate into its overall CI/CD pipeline. Automated browser testing is a technique that involves using tools or frameworks to simulate user interactions with the web application across different browsers and devices, and to verify the functionality and performance of the application. Static code quality analysis is a technique that involves using tools or frameworks to scan the code and detect any violations of the predefined coding rules and best practices, such as syntax errors, security issues, code smells, etc. Business verification testing and stress testing are also quality assurance techniques, but they are not as suitable or relevant for the CI/CD pipeline, as they are more focused on validating the business requirements and the system capacity.

질문 # 29
There has been an increase in the number of defects. Universal Containers (UC) found the root cause to be decreased in quality of code. Which two options can enforce code quality in UC's continuous integration process? Choose 2 answers

A. Increase the size of the testing team assigned to the project.
B. Introduce manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox.
C. Introduce static code analysis before deployment to the testing sandbox.
D. Introduce manual code review before deployment to the production org.

정답：B,C

설명：
Explanation
The best options to enforce code quality in UC's continuous integration process are to introduce manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox and to introduce static code analysis before deployment to the testing sandbox. Manual code review can help identify and fix any errors, bugs, or best practices violations in the code. Static code analysis can help check the code quality, complexity, and security using automated tools and standards. Introducing manual code review before deployment to the production org may be too late, as the code may have already caused defects or issues in the testing sandbox. Increasing the size of the testing team assigned to the project may not improve the code quality, as the testing team may not have the skills or authority to review or modify the code. Testing data creation is outside the scope of code quality.

질문 # 30
An architect is working on a Universal Containers (UC) project, and due to security concerns, the UC security team cannot provide the Architect with production access. Instead, a central release management team will be responsible for performing production deployments for all development teams.
How should an architect leverage the Metadata API to ensure any metadata components necessary to deploy the project's functionality Are properly communicated to the release management team?

A. Create a change set in each sandbox and download the package.xml file for the release management team.
B. Provide a spreadsheet of all components and utilize the metadata API's read Metadata()call.
C. Provide the release management team a copy of the audit trail from the sandbox you wish to deploy from.
D. Communicate the unlocked package version to the release management team.

정답：D

설명：
The best way to leverage the Metadata API to communicate the metadata components to the release management team is to use unlocked packages. Unlocked packages are a collection of metadata components that can be easily deployed and updated using the Metadata API. They also provide versioning and dependency tracking features that can help ensure the integrity and compatibility of the components.
Providing a spreadsheet, a change set, or an audit trail are not effective ways to use the Metadata API, as they do not capture the full metadata information and require manual intervention.

질문 # 31
Universal Containers has just initiated a project to implement a custom container tracking application with a large development team. The project manager is concerned that the large number of developers in a single developer pro sandbox could lead to challenges with code being overwritten. Which two methods should be used to mitigate this risk? Choose 2 answers

A. Provide each developer their own sandbox developer org and implement a code repository and continuous integration to merge code into the developer pro sandbox
B. Replace the developer pro sandbox with a Partial copy sandbox
C. Provide each developer their own sandbox developer org, and implement managed packages to deploy to the merge
D. Use a single sandbox and strictly coordinate development across shared components, and implement a code repository to allow developers to merge code into a common repository

정답：A,D

설명：
A and C are the correct answers, as they are the methods that should be used to mitigate the risk of code being overwritten by a large development team in a single developer pro sandbox. A is correct, as providing each developer their own sandbox developer org and implementing a code repository and continuous integration to merge code into the developer pro sandbox can help to isolate the changes, avoid conflicts, and ensure consistency and quality. C is correct, as using a single sandbox and strictly coordinating development across shared components, and implementing a code repository to allow developers to merge code into a common repository can help to manage the changes, prevent overwriting, and ensure version control and integration. B is incorrect, as replacing the developer pro sandbox with a partial copy sandbox is not a method that can mitigate the risk of code being overwritten, as it does not address the issue of multiple developers working on the same components, but only provides a larger data set for testing. D is incorrect, as providing each developer their own sandbox developer org, and implementing managed packages to deploy to the merge is not a method that can mitigate the risk of code being overwritten, as it does not allow for easy updates and modifications, but only creates locked and versioned components. You can learn more about this topic in the Application Lifecycle and Deployment module on Trailhead.

질문 # 32
......

Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect최고품질 인증시험공부자료: https://www.exampassdump.com/Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect_valid-braindumps.html

Jim Fisher Jim Fisher

Biography

퍼펙트한Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect최고품질예상문제모음최신덤프공부자료

Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect최고품질 예상문제모음 덤프 ----- IT전문가의 노하우로 만들어진 시험자료

최신 Salesforce Developer Development-Lifecycle-and-Deployment-Architect 무료샘플문제 (Q27-Q32):

Quick Links

Support

Resources